Novel Explorations in Computational Science and Behavioral Management

Novel Explorations in Computational Science and Behavioral Management

Resilient Urban Management: Developing Indicators Using the Delphi Technique in Five Strategic Dimensions

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Associate Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
2 PhD in Urban Planning and Researcher, Road, Housing and Urban Development Research Center, Tehran, Iran.
3 Master’s in Regional Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
Given the increasing intensity of natural hazards and climate change, resilient urban management has become an indispensable necessity in large-scale planning. This study employs the Delphi technique, engaging 20 urban development experts, to develop key resilience indicators across five strategic dimensions: economic, social, institutional, physical, and environmental. The findings indicate that indicators such as economic diversity and equitable resource distribution (economic), citizen participation and access to services (social), leadership capacity and organizational coordination (institutional), speed of infrastructure reconstruction (physical), and ecosystem protection (environmental) were agreed upon as fundamental criteria for urban resilience.
The results emphasize the necessity of integrated urban planning with a simultaneous focus on these five dimensions of resilience, particularly social participation, institutional flexibility, and environmental resilience. These indicators, derived through a systematic process by calculating the average consensus among experts, provide a practical framework for evaluating and enhancing urban resilience. They can be employed as efficient tools at various managerial levels, from policy formulation to implementation. The outcomes of this research can assist urban managers and planners in assessing and improving development plans to better withstand natural hazards and climate change.
Keywords

Subjects


پرچمی جلال، مجید، زبردست، اسفندیار، و فصیحی، حمید. (1396). کاربست مدل‌های ارزش نسبی در انتخاب و اولویت‌بندی پروژه‌های شهری با رویکرد مدیریت سبد پروژه: بررسی موردی معاونت شهرسازی و معماری شهرداری تهران. دوفصلنامه دانشگاه هنر، 48(2)، 365-375. https://journal.ut.ac.ir/article_63120.html
رفیعیان، مجتبی، رضایی، محمدرضا، عسگری، علی، پرهیزکار، اکبر، و شایان، سیاوش. (1390). تبیین مفهومی تاب‌آوری و شاخص‌ سازی آن در مدیریت سوانح اجتماع‌محور (CBDM). برنامه‌ریزی و آمایش فضا (مدرس علوم انسانی)، 15(4 (پیاپی 72))، 19-41.. https://sid.ir/paper/171828/fa
شیعه، اسماعیل، دانش پور، سید عبدالهادی، و روستا، مریم. (1396). تدوین مدل شاخص‌های مکانی پایداری اجتماعی به کمک روش دلفی و تکنیک شانون. معماری و شهرسازی آرمان شهر، 10(19 )، 119-129. https://sid.ir/paper/202411/fa
غلامی، محمدجواد، طلاچیان، مرتضی، و شهریاری، سیدکمال الدین. (1398). مرور سیستماتیک شناسایی ابعاد, مؤلفه‌ها و شاخص‌های تاب‌آوری شهری با بررسی چالش‌ها و فرصت‌ها. شهر ایمن، 2(7)، 1-19. https://sid.ir/paper/527528/fa
معصومی، لیلا. (1394). تأثیر سبک زندگی بر انعطاف‌پذیری شهری: مطالعه تطبیقی مناطق 1 و 19 شهر تهران (پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشکده علوم زمین، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی تهران).
نامجویان، فرخ، رضویان، محمدتقی، و سرور، رحیم. (1396). تاب‌آوری شهری چارچوبی الزام‌آور برای مدیریت آینده شهرها. جغرافیایی سرزمین، 14(55)، 81-95. https://sid.ir/paper/116291/fa
Dericko, C., & Pietrelli, F. (2020). Resilience as a strategic framework: Policies and urban development. Journal of Urban Studies, 35(2), 96-112. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/181
Galantini, Z., & Tezer, A. (2016). Urban planning for urban resilience as component of Istanbul’s resilient urban development. Conference Paper. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324456789
Hiltz, S. R., Hughes, A. L., Imran, M., Plotnick, L., Power, R., & Turoff, M. (2020). Exploring the usefulness and feasibility of software requirements for social media use in emergency management. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 42, Article 101367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101367
Huerga, M., Bañuls, V., Calderon, P., & Calderon, R. (2020). A Delphi-based approach for analysing the resilience level of local governments in a regional context. In ISCRAM, 602-611. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783030609564
Maguire, B., & Hagen, P. C. (2007). Disasters and communities: Understanding social resilience. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 22, 16-20. https://ajem.infoservices.com.au/items/AJEM-22-02-05
Meerow, S., & Stults, M. (2016). Comparing conceptualizations of urban climate resilience in theory and practice. Sustainability, 8(7), 701. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070701
Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 127-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
School of Urban Planning, McGill University. (2008). What is urban planning. Retrieved January 8, 2008, https://www.mcgill.ca/urbanplanning/
Schwind, K. (2009). Community resilience toolkit: A workshop guide for community resilience planning. Bay Localize, Oakland, California. https://baylocalize.org/tools/community-resilience-toolkit/
Sharifi, A., & Yamagata, Y. (2018). Principles and criteria for assessing urban energy resilience: A literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 94, 620-630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.010
Twigg, J. (2007). Characteristics of a disaster resilient community: A guidance note. UNISDR (2009). https://www.unisdr.org/files/1037_DisasterResilienceGuidanceNote.pdf
Urban Resilience. (2007). Research prospectus: A resilience alliance initiative for transitioning urban systems towards sustainable futures. https://www.resalliance.org/urban-resilience
World Economic Forum. (2021). The global risks report (16th ed.). Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2021
Volume 3, Issue 2 - Serial Number 6
March 2026
Pages 166-180

  • Receive Date 11 April 2025
  • Revise Date 12 June 2025
  • Accept Date 13 June 2025