Novel Explorations in Computational Science and Behavioral Management

Novel Explorations in Computational Science and Behavioral Management

Guide for Reviewers

Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers

The Novel Explorations in Computational Science and Behavioral Management (NECSBM) adheres to the COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers.

Confidentiality

Manuscripts under peer review must remain strictly confidential. Reviewers are prohibited from sharing manuscripts or discussing their content with anyone not involved in the peer review process. Discussions about the manuscript should be limited to the NECSBM Editor, and any sharing of information from the manuscript requires permission.

Conflicts of Interest

Reviewers must abstain from reviewing manuscripts where there are conflicts of interest due to competitive, collaborative, or other personal or professional relationships.

Criteria for Reviewing a Manuscript

- Novelty

- Originality

- Scientific Reliability

- Contribution to the Field

- Introduction of New Aspects to the Existing Field of Study

- Ethical Considerations

- Compliance with Authors' Guidelines

- Adequacy of References - Grammar, Punctuation, and Spelling

- Identification of Scientific Misconduct